What you Need to Know About the Ruling on Campaign Finance Law
There is actually a need to point out that the courts have opted to maintain the ban on corporations extending donations to political campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. The decision taken up by the Supreme Court will without a doubt bot go well with so many people. They chose not to consider removing the ban on campaign finance. As you read more, you will learn more about this decision made by the courts.
It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. The Supreme Court just chose to go by what the previous ruling on the campaign finance laws was without considering its challenges. It is for this reason that then corporates will not have the room to contribute money to campaigns as well as candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. It was barely uncommon for these corporates to donate to political campaigns every now and then right then. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. You will learn that this case was brought to court by two companies from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.
You need to be made conversant with the legal arguments that this case was premised on. It is imperative to mention that these companies indicated that the first amendment rights of companies was not being considered. They argued that freedom of speech will time and again be compromised by these political donations. They also invoked the constitution that is pillared on equally protecting each individual. It is evident that nonprofit as well as charity organizations are not allowed to finance any of these political campaigns. This means that they are treated differently from corporate entities. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling claimed that corporates are not allowed to donate money to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. As such, no political candidate will be allowed to receive any political donation from corporations.